Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 10:48

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Was Adam white or black (African)?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Recovering from surgery isn’t easy. Exercising in the water can help. - The Washington Post
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
PS5 has a huge price advantage over Xbox and Switch 2 right now - Eurogamer
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What are the causes of over sweating?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI - TechCrunch
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
New Study Finds 1 Promising Way To Keep Colon Cancer From Returning - HuffPost
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What did someone say to you that instantly made you realize their life was in danger?